How would you evaluate the level of responsibility demonstrated by AuditOrg's auditors?

When evaluating the level of responsibility demonstrated by AuditOrg's auditors, determining that there is "no negligence" implies that the auditors have performed their duties with due diligence and have adhered to established standards and practices in their auditing process. This means they have taken appropriate care in planning and executing the audit, ensuring thoroughness, accuracy, and professionalism throughout their work.

In this context, assessing the auditors as having no negligence suggests that they have fulfilled their responsibilities competently, without any oversights or failures to meet the necessary standards of practice that would compromise the integrity of the audit.

This perspective emphasizes the importance of maintaining high professional conduct in auditing, as well as the expectation that auditors are equipped with the necessary training and knowledge to execute their responsibilities effectively, thereby reinforcing the reliability of their findings and recommendations.